Log in

No account? Create an account

A view from the West

Featuring food, fuel and the future in Jersey

Perennial bit
Sustainability, community, diversity!
This is a personal view of aspects of life in Jersey, Channel Islands. It focuses on the challenges of peak oil, food production, population density and climate change on our Island's fragile social, ecological and political systems

One conference, three audiences

I was at the farming conference yesterday.  It turned out to be more interesting  than I had expected, but not for the reasons you might expect.

As with previous conferences the focus was largely on the commercial aspects of farming.  The first two speakers on brexit  showed this rather well.  They talked about the possible deals, tariffs and the impacts on employing labour.  All very significant to the business of importing and exporting  food products.  What we didn't get even a hint of were the implications for agricultural policy in the island.  How much different would the problems of Brexit  look if we had treated farming as a strategic resource. Growing nutritious food for the local market instead of exporting a narrow band of produce for cash and importing the food we eat at additional costs. We did get a glimpse about this in the last session about SCOOP.

The middle two speakers were techheads., one presenting on-line from Microsoft in the USA.  That would have been a lot more convincing had they been able to keep the slides in synch.  Funny given the key part of the presentation was about using redundant TV bandwith to facilitate mega data capture on farms.  The other tech presentation was from the lecturer at Harper Adams who  did the hands free hectare. (http://www.handsfreehectare.com/).  A dynamic presenter with a passion  for what he does.  Full marks from me for an academc  showng  the theory can be implemented.  Not that I believe it is the right way to go.  I asked the question of the two of them: doesn't this drive  for tech  mean we are deskilling, devaluing and ultimately destroying the human element of farming?

That question led me to discover the second audience at the conference.  (The first being of course the farming businesses).  At least half a dozen people approached my at the break because of that question .  All but one were women and they all said the same thing - its the question on their mind too.  These people are all small scale food producers/processors and smallholders.  They value the lifestlye and the flexibility  and the personal touch in what they do. They likely don't have the capital to invest in robo tech, not that they would want to.  If anything such tech threatens to  destroy their opportunity to work as they want.  I will relate you a comment I made to one of the young market garden growers I know who was there.

See X,  if you spend a load of money on this stuff you could have an army of tech doing the work for no pay. (he has employees now).  In a couple of years you can retire, maybe take up a hobby.  Oh I don't know, something a bit active and useful, maybe say vegetable gardening  !

I won't say much about the presentation of the dairy advisor at Reading.  It was of some interest to me as he was dealing largely with greenhouse gas emissions (methane, NO2) from cattle and how it is affected by feed and  additives.  Apparently farmers have to be told that things that affect sheep  digestion don't affect cattle digestion (who would have thought?).

Jersey Hemp presented on what they are doing and the products they are producing.  They have expanded from an initial  2 vergee trialling to 240 vergee last year, and still llooking for more land, preferably organic.   The main value of what they do to my mind is to  offer the possibility of a break in the cropping  cycle which is very much needed on potato fields.  However my opinion is  they are going to have to access a lot more land  if it is to have a much impact across the whole Island, probably 10 times what they are now.

I have left the best until last.  The two speakers who addressed things pretty high on my agenda.  Emeritus Professor Mark Kibblewhite of Cranfield University and India Hamilton of Scoop.  The prof gave a very good analogy of the complex interating parts of soil and is microbiology as an engine.  And of course if you push it too far bad things happen.  A number of his papers can be downloaded at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark_Kibblewhite . India spoke about the origins and thinking befind the newly created SCOOP cooperative.  She address the problem of alternative supply chains for organic growers locally, and of the imbalance of scale.  Scoop is a co-operative run venture between  local growers and consumers with low waste and no single use plastic.   She has set up a kitchen at the site based on her previous experience in India and London to maximise use fo the produce that might otherwase be perfectly edible but presentationally unsaleable.  Their initial fundy was crowdsource in a very short time (see https://chuffed.org/project/scoopjersey) mostly they communicate on Facebook ( https://www.facebook.com/groups/organicjersey/)

Now I have yet to mention the third 'audience'.  I am not sure how big this group might be.  I met two but there could be  more.  One was someone I used to work with, no connexion to farming.  He was there sussing out opportunities for his newly formed venture.  They are into data management and packaging/presentation management. The other person I met who also was not from a growing backgound was Rachel who runs the IoT work as Digital Jersey.  She was looking for opportunites  to collaborate with farmers/growers on using tech locally.

Two other observations I have to make about what was there. Actually about what was not there.  One of the presentations was pulled I believe by the organisers.  The Morning  Boat were planning to present some material about  agricultural workers rights.  I'll leave readers to draw their own conclusions about  the implications of that.  The other thing to note, I only spotted 2 other of the 12 or so certified organic local producers at the conference. It was only a couple of years ago you might well have seen all of them there.

I came away with a  rather uneasy feeling about all this.  The whole technology push  both inside and without  feels akin to the way the chemical companies treated farming  in the 1950's.  More capital required, more  control and conformance to third parties who  supply the 'magic'. And before long the farmer is the servant of the  agri bis corporations and the soul and joy and even perhaps livelihood has disappeared.

Mundane changes for imperfect walkers?
What else to make of a leaflet captioned pedestrian improvements?

Minority interests

An item appeared in my newsfeeds today that got me fuming.

This  is was piqued by a piece about the Inter-Island Environment Meeting that happened at Crabbé a couple of days ago. I don't know how long it has been going - I found references to a meeting in Alderney in 2015. Oddly none of the groups in which I have an active role appear ever been invited to participate in these events.   After a bit of searching  I found the possibly partial delegate organisation list:

Eco Active Jersey;
Plastic Free Jersey;
The National Trust for Jersey;
States of Jersey;
Jersey National Park;
Société Jersiase Marine Biology Section;
Jersey Biodiversity Centre;
Aldeney Wildlife Trust;
Marine Conservation Society;
The Pollinator project;
Durrell Wildlife Conservation;
Jersey Bat Group;
The UK Overseas territories family.

Take off the non Jersey groups and you pretty much have a list of the approved, States sanctioned  groups.  The ones you are allowed to belong to without tarnishing your soft , safe, conservative image.  And most of those have permanent staff, people who can take or day or two at a conference  without any impact on  their income or business.

According to the JEP "The potential for a Channel Island Environmental Charter was also discussed, which proponents say will help the islands focus on conservation".   Most of the conseration they will be doing, certainly on land, is going to have to be with  farmers and smalholders.  It is inescapable when roughly half the Island land mass is agricultural ground.

But no ,lets not talk to farmers and growers and smallholders. Especially not those spesky certified organic people with their absence of pesticides and herbicides and planting of habitat, varied crop rotations and leys.  What the hell have they got to offer.  And lets not bother with those climate change nutters. You know the ones who have been saying for years that we need to act because it is going to change  habitats and breeding cycles and migration patterns and invasive species and diseases and pollination and crops and all that.  What on Earth has any of that to do with conservation?

Of course it isnt just this sort of meeting that gets treated with carefully honed  degree of exclusivity.  I hear there is to be another Farming Conference in Jersey, probably November 8th.  Do you think as a land owner, smalholder or being on the committee of a couple of groups with interests in famring that I have had any indication about it ?  I heard from a en passant comment from an aquaintance who isnt a farmer or smalholder when discussing some other topic. As in previous years it seems the organisers are  trying to be as tight lipped and intropsective as ever about the time and place and agenda. It one thing to talk about open transparent  initiatives, but quite another for the public to expect  quango like organisations to actually be so !

No wonder this Island is in such a damned mess.  These groups  need to be reaching out, not convening in secret huddles. The land and its usage is central in common to both these interest groups.  We need common ground and for that we need open dialogue.


Of seeds and seasonality

Feariing we might get hit with high winds  from the remnant of hurricane Helene, I've been focussed on saving seed in the field. Particularly from the taller plants most likely to be damaged such as quinoa and amaranth. I planted later than usual because of the wet cold start to the year.  Consequently their harvest is later too  though they have gained a week or so due to the very mild weather  recently.

It is a very inefficient  use of my time  really  - it takes a few hours to harvest and  winnow a kilo of grain by hand.  However I realy like the look of the plants - they are sometimes sold as ornamentals.  Those I don't  harvest  will be readily raided by hunrgy birds later in  the year and when I do get round to cutting down the stalks prior to planting  maincrop potatoes next year they will provide a useful bulk of high carbon material for compost making.

I have had a vexing time this year with some seeds.  Packet after packet of the bought in parsnip and lettuce failed to germinate.  Fortunately I had  some of my own saved seed of the same varieties that did germinate.  I  might put that down to the catalogue I use has changed management and perhaps they  got their handling wrong early on?

Interestingly while I struggled to get some  things to germinate, I had quite a lot of self seeded lettuce, parsnip, chard and radish  come up.  It reminded me of a question I have meant to look into before and never persued.  Why do gardeners and growers  sow seeds in Spring when nature scatters them in Autumn?

I can identify a few reasons.  First, there are those seeds that require particular treatment to germinate.  Typically non native plants that need  protection or more warmth (or cold!)  than would likely happen if left to try to self seed.  Second there is  variety and selection - particularly if you grow hybrids  - they won't come true or might cross pollinate.  Third is control.  Important for anyone using mechanisation to have a degree of uniformity.  But also for  successional croping to  ensure a continual harvest through the season rather than a glut. 

But for all that I cannot help wondering if there might be something in scattering  selected seed of indigenous and naturalised seed in the Autumn to save effort in the Spring. And then there is another question about seed sowing .  Nature  mixes things up  - different plants of diverse species growing  together.  There are gardeners who do that - its called polyculture.  I'm not sure how I'd manage that under the strict Organic certification rules requirung crop rotation.

Maybe if I have another year of germintion failure while self seeded stuff pops up I'Il give it a go.

In the Field

This morning  I felled a couple of  4 metre sycmores.  It only took half an hour.  Believe me it is less arduous than taking a sickle to bracken.  Practice is needed to get accustomed to handling the axe, but once you have the feel for it....  Washington of course is famous for taking  down a cherry tree, and Gladstone took it up as a hobby when an M.P. and was still doing it in his 80's.

We have plenty of trees around the field, especially sycamore, but also sweet chestnuts, elders and oaks.  That means plenty of leaves for leafmould .  But sycmours are prolific seeders and trees are liable to pop up everywhere.  Those on the veg beds get weeded out asap, but  at the north end among the bracken I let them grow a couple of years.  Apart from sequestering a bit of carbon, it also provides a nice size of ramial like branches to use as a base for compost heaps. It is best to let the dry a year before using.  You do have to think ahead to do this.

I had forgotten to mention a little informal experiment I did last year with leafmould.  I planted a few of my Lady Balfour potatoes under the chicken wired area when I started filling it.  I was a bit dubious thinking the rodents would probably eat all the tubers, but I persisted.  The bin ended up about a metre deep in leaves by the end of November.  However leaves contract in volume very notably as decay proceeds and by April there were potato shoots up through the  remaining  layer.  I didn't get round to harvesting until late.  Truth is I forgot amongst the other jobs and only got to it when I wanted to bag up the leaf mold and dismantle the bin so I could plant out  stuff.

I was peasantly surprised.  They were easy to lift - just scrape away the leaf mold with the fork.  They were much bigger than my normal grown tubers.  Yes there wes some evidence of  slug damage and rodent gnawing  , but  plenty were good enough to  harvest.  My normal planted potatoes struggled with the lack of rain.  I did water them but the process is too slow by hand to make much difference.  The result I would say the leafmould bin potatoes were better and certainly  less effort.  That probably just reflects the remakable  moisture retention capability of leafmould.  Given I was going to collect  the leaves and make the bin anyway a harvest of minimum effort potatoes was a big bonus.  

Elsewhere the outdoor  tomato harvest has gone from  looking  unbelievably good to  almost a write off.   Unusually for outdoot tomatoes I had quite a bit of greenback.  That is caused by  excess strong sunlight and too high heat.  It is much more common I think in greenhouses.  Then the rain came.  Too much water after a dry period  causes the fruit to burst.  There's still enough salvageable for cooking down for passata, but we probably won't have as many bottled as last year despite growing twice the area.

lllness and indolence

Being a smallholder is rather like being self employed.  You carry all the responsibility and if you don't work you don't earn/eat.  If you are lucky you might qualify for Social Security benefits.  However since I grow to eat rather and for money, the income  is way below the threshold for  paying social security.  Thus no sickpay and no pension entitlements accruing.

So when I visit the doctor, as I did the other day, it tends to be for something persistent and troubling.  He pointed out the last time I was in his surgery was five years ago when I had bad sciatica.  A battery of samples were taken for testing. Most have to go to the hospital for analysis.  A few simple ones give immediate results.  His first suspicion was early onset diabetes.  But the blood pressure and blood sugars are normal.  I have a presciption to take if certain changes in symptoms appear, but in the mean time just have to wait a couple of weeks for the hospital results.  That's not the hard part.  Being told to rest, that's the hard part.  Indolence does not come easily (or cheaply) to me.

Fortunately I've just about finished cutting bracken - a job that constitutes seriously hard work.   A lot of the current activity is harvesting  which can be done gently and slowly.  The main thing that may have to be delayed is preparation of new beds for next year. That's a great pity as I had hoped to get the whole system up to full operation next year - all 100 beds and lays and chickens, leaf mold, compost  and perennial plantings.


Blink and you might miss local democracy
I've just spotted the notice of nominations for a Procureur and 2 Centeniers in the parish.  I knew a Centenier's election ought to be coming as a vacancy was created when the new Connetable was elected.

Nomination meetings will be held on Wednesday 22 August 2018 at St. Ouen Parish Hall:

  • at 7.30pm to elect a Procureur du Bien Public for a three year term of office expiring September 2021

  • at 7.45pm to elect a Centenier for a three year term of office expiring September 2021

  • at 8pm to elect a Centenier to complete a term of office expiring December 2020

A nomination form for each candidate must be produced to the meeting and must be completed by a proposer and nine seconders who are electors of the Parish.

It appears the notice was posted the 13th of August.  August is a holiday time for rmany people, especially those with school age children, and of course the States don't sit in the summer.  You might wonder how that fits with giving just 9 days notice of an election.  I can quite imagine some competent potential candidates will never have had the chance to stand as their 2 weeks holiday totally overlaps the notice and nomination period.

The reality is these positions are seldom contested in most Parishes.  In the past when it has happened in St Ouen I have heard grumbling about it all being unnecessary.  "Elections cost money" and "We all know who will get elected".  The pragmatic way is that people are usually approached to stand by one of those already in a position in the Parish . Might had had some  merit in days when people tended to live and work  all their lives in the same place, but these days?

This tension in the parishes bewteen a pragmatic approach to electing people to the administration against the modern day  expectations of democracy has come to the fore.   Senator Mezec opined about it on a blog.  A commentary about that appreared on another blog, and comments have also been made by our constable (also  assistant chief minister) that can be read about on a third blog.


Whatever side of this debate you take there is a problem.  No matter what nice theoretical mechanics are adopted without candidates there is no choice and without choice there is no democracy.  For most of these parish administration roles there is little by way of policy or influence that goes with the position.  An election is largely a determination of who is more capable administratively.  It is slightly different for Centenier and Procureur in that there is some influence they have over budgets/spending and policing policy for example.

So here is the conundrum.  If you want to save the Parish system, the best thing you can do is to contest positions to  force a vote thereby facilitating at least a degree of democracy.  Exactly the  'waste of money and time' that many electors react against.

Just to be clear, yes I have been sounded out in the past about standing for Centenier.  I cannot quite see how they think I am going to drive the police car.  I would be quite interested to see what the magistrates made of my beard and pony tail  making a prosecution case before them in court.  Realisitically I don't think it is a plausible role for me.

I've never really thought about Procureur du Bien Publique. Being a legal and finaincial representative of the Parish is not a likely place for bold change.  It would require a bit if a novel take on the role, thinking a bit broader than finances to a more general notion of resources.

We could for example as a Parish produce the equivalent of ecological footprint accounts
( see https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8d6b/9d58646221343d61fb929e173677e658d21e.pdf and https://elearning.humnet.unipi.it/pluginfile.php/101791/mod_resource/content/0/Footprint%20Method%202006.pdf

Before you think that infeasible, it is worth noting Caldecott and Bull  reported footprints for British cities over a decade ago. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/3311349/UKs-largest-carbon-footprints-revealed.html
St Ouen's population is greater than the City of St David, and comparable to that of St  Asaph)

You might be aware that the Parish rate per quarter has gone down the last few years.  The lastest decrease was largely down to the States  paying rates on property in the Parish so the number of quarters assessed has increased.  Paying less in rates is very nice, but we might have been wiser to have a smaller reduction and started a programme of activities looking to the future.  For example under the Energy Pathway 2050 there is an objective for renewable energy (30%) bt 2050.  As a Parish we have so far achived I think 0.

This is another quote from the report  The Minister for Planning and Environment, through the Eco-Active Energy Efficiency Service will:
i. In 2015 design a pilot study that will demonstrate the potential for community scale microrenewable schemes and energy autonomous housing e.g. Solar PV and solar thermal, ground/air-source heat pumps, anaerobic digestion and potentially Combined Heat and Power (CHP) schemes This will take the form of a competitive tender process where communities will be invited to submit a proposal for their project. The pilot will be independently verified in order to assess the suitability of the model for further roll-out Island wide.

Where is the scheme, why are we not as a Parish community demanding  the Minister come up with the goods?  This sort of tender should be the high on the agenda of a Procureur.

In the absence of the States actually delivering on their  commitments on climate change and ecology, we have no choice but to act as a Parish ourselves.  If we have not reduced our rates so quickly we might have had some capital to invest in ground source heat pumps or solar PV for some Parish buildings.  That would produce cost savings on fuel bills, and potentially a return greater than the paltry amount possible having cash on deposit.  Yes, no other Parish has done that as far as I am aware, but that's never stopped us in the past.   We didn't turn against building homes for the elderly and electing women to the honorary police just because others weren't doing it.

So my fellow Gris Ventres, I'll  leave it up to you.  If there are 10 of you out there who can organise yourselves to get a nomination in on time, I'm happy to argue the above in an election.   If there aren't 10 of you who agree or can get organised, then perhaps the argument made by some that the Parish system isn't working and cannot be modernised has more validity than you realised.

Paroisse de St Ouën, Assemblée Paroissiale

An Assembly of Principals and Electors of the Parish of St. Ouen will be held in St. Ouen’s Parish Hall on Wednesday 1 August, 2018 at 8pm to:

  • receive, and if deemed advisable, approve the Act of the Parish Assembly held on Wednesday 13 June 2018

  • receive, and if deemed advisable, adopt the accounts of the Connétable for the financial year 2017 to 2018, the said accounts having been previously audited by the Parish Accountants and examined by the Committee named for the purpose

  • receive, and if deemed advisable, approve the Connétable’s Estimates for the financial year 2018 to 2019, including grants to various charities
    having approved the estimates, tax the rate accordingly and order that it be levied

  • name a Committee to examine the accounts of the Connétable for the financial year 2018 to 2019

A summary of the accounts, together with the estimates, will be available to members of the public from Monday 30 July 2018 at St. Ouen’s Parish Hall during normal office hours.

The future of vegetables and pulses.

Interesting read from the London School of Hygene and Tropical Medicine.


"If no action is taken to reduce the negative impacts on agricultural yields, the researchers estimate that the environmental changes predicted to occur by mid- to end-century in water availability and ozone concentrations would reduce average yields of vegetables and legumes by 35% and 9% respectively. In hot settings such as Southern Europe and large parts of Africa and South Asia, increased air temperatures would reduce average vegetable yields by an estimated 31%."

Also I note it comments on one of the memes quoted by certain  people  locally about C02 being  'plant food' and elevated levels  increase yields.  "Previous research has shown that raised levels of carbon dioxide would increase crop yields, but this study identified for the first time that these potential yield benefits are likely to be cancelled out in the presence of simultaneous changes in other environmental exposures."  I shouldn't but I   can , so : told you so!

Just in case you were wondering, no we (the world) aren't  reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.  We aren't hitting those Paris agreement targets.  Quite the opposite.   https://e360.yale.edu/digest/co2-levels-break-another-record-exceeding-411-parts-per-million From 2016 to 2017, the global CO2 average increased by 2.3 ppm — the sixth consecutive year-over-year increase greater than 2 ppm, according to Scripps researchers. Prior to 2012, back-to-back increases of 2 ppm or greater had occurred only twice.

For the present our household is awash with our own lettuce, broad beans, peas and strawberries.

Assemblée Paroissiale

An Assembly of Principals and Electors of the Parish of St Ouen will be held in St Ouen’s Parish Hall on Wednesday 13 June 2018 at 9pm to:

  • receive, and if deemed advisable, approve the Act of the Parish Assembly held on Wednesday 6 December 2017

  • elect from the inhabitants of the Parish, without regard to Cueillettes, a Constable’s officer for Petite Cueillette

  • elect from the inhabitants of the Parish, without regard to Cueillettes, a Constable’s Officer for Grande Cueillettes

  • elect from the inhabitants of the Parish, without regard to Cueillettes, two Constable’s Officer for the Cueillette de Grantez

  • elect in conformity with Article 5 of the Loi Sur la Voirie a Roads Inspector for the Cueillette de Millais