Crest

A view from the west

Featuring food, fuel and the future in Jersey

Lenny Harper is a hero
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

Aspersions are being cast in some of the local fora and media sites about Lenny Harper. These remarks often concern the media handling on the investigation at Haut de la Garenne. Even national newspapers were, it is claimed, misled. Some kind of investigative reporters they must be! Well I have a different view – as I have said in the senatorial election hustings, and elsewhere, Lenny Harper is a hero. 

I have not described him as a deity, or a paragon, a saviour or a visionary but a hero. I know he is not infallible; he is after all a human being just like you, me, Stuart Syvret, and 6.6 billion others on this planet. So what makes Lenny different, a hero?

To understand this you need to appreciate a couple of well known and frankly obvious facts about being in care, especially institutional care. Anyone in care over the age of about 5 is all too aware that they are different. Society views children in care differently, and not positively: detritus at best, dangerous proto criminals more typically. Yet the majority of children in care are there because they need protection from those who should be protecting and nurturing them. Children in this situation don’t have much of a voice, who is going to listen to them? But it gets worse. What do you think is the self-esteem level of children in care, knowing that’s what the world thinks? 

Now on top of all that, which applies to a very large proportion of children in care, add the special problems of having been abused, or even having been a witness to abuse in a home. Not just any old abuser, but the people who are there to look after you, the ones who are in authority over you. If you are brave enough to think to complain or take issue, whom do you tell? Someone else in authority of course, another professional. Who’s story are they going to believe? A troubled powerless oik, or a fellow respected professional who could make you own professional life awkward?

If you have understood any of the above you will readily appreciate the big, very big, issues care leavers have with authority figures. That includes of course the police. This is a mountain of a problem because the police are effectively a monopoly –only they can investigate child abuse and bring the perpetrators to justice. But to do that requires evidence and in this sort of case that evidence starts with witness statements – ideally multiple corroborating independent witness statements. Apart from a few staff that come forward, those statements come, of course, from the victims and survivors. 

So how do you as a police investigator acquire the evidence of victim witnesses if they wont come forward because they have a well-founded mistrust of authority? You go out to win trust. You communicate, you are as open and transparent as possible, and you take the information given to you by victims and survivors, initially at least, at face value. You treat those discarded, un-regarded, little heard and never respected care leavers like proper human beings. 

And that is what makes Lenny Harper a hero to many victims and survivors.  The simple act of treating others in the way they should have been treated all along, and thereby gaining their trust. So very simple and effective. Well over a hundred people have come forward. 

Isn’t it odd? The very thing that many people seek to criticise about Mr Harper’s handling of the investigations is the very aspect that worked as far as the survivors and victims are concerned. And it is the survivors and victims who are the paramount concern here, isn’t it?

To err is human, but to real foul a child up put them in the care system
Crest
[info]st_ouennais


Reading Stuart Syvret's blog  stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/ I noticed someone posted a classically ill informed attempt to cast all children in care as criminals.   A common and utterly incorrect assumption.  So here are some FACTS pertinent to the UK. As far as I know no-one has bothered to collate the equivalent information locally.

Most children – 80 per cent – enter care because of abuse or neglect, or for family reasons.  Less than 10 per cent enter care because of their own behaviour.  That's from the UK cabinet office social exclusion task force.  Even then of those 10% only half actually caused the behaviour that got them into care.

Two-thirds live in foster care and one in 10 in children’s homes.  This is a crucial point.  The statistics for life chances for care leavers simply cannot be attributed solely to that small proportion in homes  - it affects foster children as well. 

In 2001, only 8 per cent of children in care achieved five or more A*–C grades at GCSE, compared to half of all young people.  Children in care have poor results in Key Stage tests at age seven, 11 and 14. Just 1 per cent go to university.  I have seen a figure of 4%, but I think that includes all further and higher education at any stage. The 1% is those going straight to university at 18.  Compare that 1% to the UK government target of 50% of school leavers going to university, or the currently achieved average of 43%

The health of children in care is poorer than that of other children. 45% of children in care are assessed as having a mental disorder compared with around 10% of the general population.

According to Brook, children in and leaving care are at high risk of pregnancy. 25% of care leavers have had a child by the age of 16; almost half of care leavers are mothers within 18-24 months of leaving care.

39% of male prisoners under 21, and 22% of all male prisoners, have been looked after by local authorities at some point in their childhood.

Between a quarter and a third of rough sleepers were in care.

Do I really need to go on?  And I would remind you reader, these are averages across the system, including well run and supportive institutions and homes.  Now you go figure how those life chances change when you have been in a violent, abusive or victimising institution or home, and ask yourself exactly where the problem is here.  What is it that turns  a near normal sample of children into rough sleepers, prisoners, and pregnant teenagers?


http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/~/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/social_exclusion_task_force/publications_1997_to_2006/abefcic_summary_2%20pdf.ashx

http://www.brook.org.uk/content/M6_4_teenage%20pregnancy.asp


More from Liz Davies
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/social-care-experts-blog/2008/08/jersey-must-learn-lessons-from.html

"In the absence of prosecutions there are likely to be current child victims. The Jersey investigation provides an opportunity for both the UK and Jersey governments to demonstrate a willingness to support staff, children, adults and families in speaking out  to inform both current and historic investigation"

Well said Liz, carry on the good work.


 

Maybe its different this time.
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

The triennial question has been asked, as it always is.  Former school mates and more recent confidants who know my background well have been enquring if I will finally stand in the States elections.  My normal response is to what end, what could one person achieve in the States, assuming I were elected? I know my views and priorities are in the minority in the general population, and probably even more so in the States chamber.  If I weigh things up can I do more inside or outside?  Bear in mind that I have been there before - different assembly, but the same problem of being a very small minority in a predominantly one party system. It saps the strength and grinds you down.  There are fires to fight on all fronts, and the odds are heavily stacked against you making any headway.  I ended up spending more time helping constituents navigate the social security system, and writing letters on their behalf about Council service issues than ever I did in debates or significantly influencing the Council policy.  I could have done that without being elected.

So is  it different this time?  I don't think the Jersey population has had a great revelation and changed its view of the priorities.  I don't even believe the outrage that was felt when GST was introduced will carry over enough into the elections to change the outcome much.  However in one important respect, for me, it is very different this time. You see what most of those old schoolmates and confidants don't know, and what puts me an a specific unusual position in these particular elections is personal.  Merely standing for the election, regardless of the outcome, will ensure the big local issue that all the declared election candidates so far have signally failed to mention will not be forgotten.  

Here's the thing - I was officially the responsibility of the States of Jersey Children's Service in the 1960's.  I am a care leaver.  Not only that I am one of just 4% of care leavers who get a higher education.  I feel a moral obligation to ensure the child care issues are faced head on by the electorate and candidates in the election no less than I feel the electorate needs to understand the immediacy of action on climate change and peak oil.  And yet I can't bring myself to believe I can make any significant difference in the House of Shame  States Chamber.  I am genuinely undecided.



A proposal for the Opera House
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

David Harrower's new play, 365,  previewed in Inverness on the 13th August and goes to Edinburgh next week.  It deals with leaving the child care system, a significant issue in itself. The play is notionally set in a practice flat that is supposed to prepare children for leaving care and entering the adult world.

I see the National Theatre for Scotland notes that state: Suitable for age 16+ !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/08/08/bt365108.xml

http://www.nationaltheatrescotland.com/content/default.asp?page=s416

http://www.nationaltheatrescotland.com/content/default.asp?page=home_365

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre/reviews/edinburgh-preview-365-the-playhouse-890080.html

There are currently over 70,000 children in care in the UK and, on average, they pass through eleven stages of being "looked after" by the state.   I wonder if the Opera House could be persuaded to bring it here? It might be a valuable eye opener to the local population about the issues of being in and leaving care,  regardless of the added life shattering trauma of abuse in the system.

À  la préchaine


Home