Crest

A view from the West

Featuring food, fuel and the future in Jersey

Perennial bit
Sustainability, community, diversity!
This is a personal view of aspects of life in Jersey, Channel Islands. It focuses on the challenges of peak oil, food production, population density and climate change on our Island's fragile social, ecological and political systems



NEW. Now listed on best green blogs here Why not leave a rating there?


follow on twitter


In the field
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

Planting and sowing has been haywire this year,  The dry early season start  was not so bad, but meant hand watering outdoor seedlings in March.  May on the other hand has been wet and windy, so much so that I delayed sowing  many items, and my dwarf peach tree has only just gone outside, possibly too late for fruit this year.

As always it has been a  mixed lot of results so far. The salsify and shallots are looking excellent. Both have recently been weeded.  The peas I sowed in pots and transplanted out are looking OK, but the direct sowed maincrop Rondo are a total loss - I suspect the mice are happy though.   The spring wheat is not obliging, but the oats are making headway now.

We've been cutting asparagus for a couple of weeks, and just started pulling rhubarb.  The strawberries have plenty of flowers on them and we could be eating them in around 6 weeks time.  The overwintered broad beans look healthy and have flowers but there is little sign of pods forming.  Usualy we start picking in the third week of May, but that seems unliklely this year.

I have aquired a 'free' second hand greenhouse approximately 5 m by 2m in bits. I am awaiting spare parts and  a lull in the work schedule before putting it up.  As you can see below we have also put up another crop protection thing, just in time for planting out brassicas.

It arrives all wraped up.  In the car port out of the wet  A sunny day - check the contents are all there
It's arrived                                In the carport to keep dry        Checking the parts
Here's a plot I prepared earlier  Helen marking out the edges  Stakes are done  
A plot I prepared earlier        Helen stakes the edges          The stakes are in

Jobs for the whole family  The first arch
Jobs for the whole family                                          The first arch is up

The final item  The finished tunnel
The finshed  item 12 m long, covered in mesh to keep out pests and reduce wind a bit.  Unlike the rigid design of polytunnels, this is very flexible.  There are no permanent fixings, so it can be dismantled and moved without much difficutly.

A slow worm  Pumpkin plant to go out  Alpine strawberry flowers
A slow worm                          Pumpkins to plant out              Alpine strawberry
Salsify flowers    Asparagus 

last years salsify for seed      main crop potatoes                  asparagus for dinner, again.

From facebook
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

I get a lot of meeting events and posts on Facebook.  This one may be of interest to some who read this journal.  I have no idea which peson of group are behind it.


Royal Square, St Helier  15:00 12th May
12 MAY GLOBAL SPRING IS THE DAY WHEN WE ALL TAKE OUR FREEDOM TO EXPRESS THE NEED FOR THE CHANGE

THE DIFFERENCE IN JERSEY IS THAT WE DO NOT FIGHT FOR THE SAME GOALS AS IN OTHER COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD

WE FIGHT FOR SOLIDARITY WITH OHER COUNTRIES FIRST OF ALL, BECAUSE WE KNOW HOW MUCH HARMFULL IS THE ISLAND SYSTEM FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD

WE DISAGREE WITH THE DICTATORSHIP IN POLITICS AND ECONOMICS LAWS IN THE ISLAND

WE DO NOT WANT TO ACCEPT ANY MORE THAT THE WORLD IS SUFFERING BECAUSE JERSEY'S LAWS AND GREED

AGAINST ECONOMIC DICTATORSHIP, OFFSHORE TAX HAVEN, FINANCE/GREED OCCUPATION OF THE ISLAND

AGAINST POLITICAL DICTATORSHIP

AGAINST FOOD AND ENERGETIC CONTROL

PRO NEW CONSCIOUSNESS ACCORDING ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS

PRO NEW CONSCIOUSNESS ACCORDING ALL HUMAN BEEN NEEDS

PRO A PEACEFUL AND FREE REVOLUTION



SPEAK UP FREE JERSEY is a network of people, who is tired of living in a system governed by the enslavement of our minds and control of our capacity as agents of the reality we live.

On the island of Jersey, since the Second World War and Nazi occupation, lives a second occupation, THE GREED. This has also produced the "legality" of the political dictatorship, Lack of Freedom of Expression generalized and commonly accepted, and FEAR, real and effective, among those who do not intend to accept.

How? Making the life impossible to this people, who look for the truth for the best future of the Island and are pointed as traitors.

Jersey is a tax haven legalized and controlled by the Financial Net of the City of London, whose financial system has a direct impact on the life in poverty of thousands of people around the world and the precarious nature of many of the inhabitants of the island itself, which can not afford the cost of living here or are daily afraid surrounded by the censorship and the hypocrisy.

The Island is full of people who represents the worst side of the RICHNESS by: High Inequality (among inhabitants and among rest of inhabitants of the World), exorbitant and irresponsible consumerism, precarious workers/slaves, political control, media control and hypocrisy.That's why is so important to be really aware what a TAX HAVEN causes.

We are against POVERTY, we fight for freedom, we want to understand how works all this "magic bubble of the offshore financial system", we want to have the right to say in public "NO, WE DON'T AGREE!", we want to learn which consequences have the financial activities of the Island in the rest of the World, we want to think together a better future for the next generations, we want to end GREED, we want to start TRUTH!

Whatever we are, our beliefs, our qualifications, our age, we have in common one thing: We know that the way to change the reality is first to really understand the situation and be truly AWARE. ONLY THE TRUTH, the CONSCIOUSNESS will give us FREEDOM.

We probably have in common the development of our knowledge in different spheres:
raising up our consciousness about Environmental Sustainability (from our own daily decisions related with Consumption -Food, Energy, Recycling...- to the global decisions like property of the resources and the used of them);
Solidarity and concern about Poverty;
consciousness about social issues as Education,Health, Housing and Work Rights;
Real Democracy and the problem on Politic;
Economy, different economic systems in place and ALTERNATIVES, and the fight against the worst governmental businesses as the WAR & TERROR, DICTATORSHIPS, NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY DEPENDENCY, FOOD DEPENDENCY...; and as well,
our PERSONAL SPIRITUALLY DEVELOPMENT (our INNER TRUTH).

Probably everything starts from the last one (our inner truth), and we have the RIGHT to be strong on that, to can afford the rest. EVERYTHING ABOVE IS INTERCONNECTED.

We don't fight just for ourselves, our comfort, we want to start the change from ourselves (being very critical with our own life and our daily decisions) and extend the capacity we lucky have to fight for all these people who can not do it in the Rest of the World. WE ARE ALL ONE, EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED.

In this network we want to be listened, to speak without fear, to learn, to share, to understand, to exchange. We don't pretend to be experts in anything more than in THE SEARCH OF THE TRUTH, LOVE FOR OTHER HUMAN BEEN AND THE EARTH WHERE WE LIVE , COMPASSION AND LOVE FOR THE NEXT GENERATION COMING. In the end, all this debate can help us to make the next generation understands the World from a different, advanced , improved point (s) of view which will help us on the EVOLUTION.

This network is not leaded by anyone, is leaded by all of us. We refuse any way of "fight" which involves violence, VERBAL or PHYSICAL, so it includes this website and the comments, which should help to build, not to destroy. We expect RESPECT among the participants.

We should be smart using this website and all we know we are afraid to take part on this, so think to who you suggest the web, who will want to join it to build something together, not boycott it or to destroy it. WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSIONS ON ALL LEVELS, TAKING ALL RISKS, so if you are afraid of hostility with your employers, neighbors...there is an easy solution, create a SPECIFIC ACCOUNT for that, or go ahead facing it, as you want:)


THERE IS A HOPE FOR A BETTER FUTURE, ALL DEPENDS OF US

WE WERE SLEEPING, NOW WE WAKE UP
Tags:

Information is food
Crest
[info]st_ouennais

I do so love finding these parallels between seemingly  distinct and unrelated concepts.




Information, if viewed from the point of view of food, is never a production issue. … It's a consumption issue, and we have to start thinking about how we create diets [and] exercise.”

Inquiring into inquiries
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
Earlier this week we had a seminal headline of its kind in the  JEP - fear that immigrants are exploiting public services.  See http://www.thisisjersey.com/news/2012/05/02/fear-that-immigrants-are-exploiting-public-services/  It needs to be commented upon as there numerous aspects to this.

It is linguistically interesting.  It is intended to convey the message that there is a problem.  However as readers will note there is nothing in the body of the text giving any prima facie evidence of this.  In fact the clue is in the word fear.  We are not expected to imagine ministers cowering in the States building while hoards of wheelchair users roll off the ferry to seek medical treatment in the island.  No, fear is a code word for we think it might be happening, but we dont know, indeed have no evidence for it.

There is a second pejorative term in there too - exploting.  It conveys in a negative sense, that these people are doing something they should not, but  the dictionary defines exploitation   as the act of employing to the greatest possible advantage.  But of course there is nothing illegal in that in the generic sense. This contrasts with the recent case of a local ferry company employing people below the minimum wage.   Similarly we have concerns being expressed about misuse by companies of zero hours contracts. So why , despite some real evidence of a problem, is there no  urgent call for an inquiry in to those forms of exploitation?

Another notable problem with the piece is the lack of any definition of who is considered an immigrant.  You might argue anyone not born here is an immigrant. That route leads to all sorts of problems relating to spouses and legally recognised partnerships.   One could take the view that anyone who does not have that odious stamp is their passport  is an immigrant.  That would make the ovewhelming portion of the resident population immigrants.

However there are  far more important problems with the thinking here - political problems.  If you cast your mind back to the GST debate, perhaps the key argument touted by its supporters was that everyone would be contributing.  It might have been excusable to argue that if people were not contributing they should not be benefitting.  However to expect people to contribute and simultaneously be excluded from benefitting is simply discrimination.

There can be few in the island who are not aware we have huge difficulties in recruiting and retaining some skilled staff, especially nurses.  For these essential jobs the pay may be comparable to the UK, but the higher costs of living here make things much less attractive, even non-viable.  The prospect of futher removing or restricting access to public benefits by such essential people will only exacerbate the problem.  

Finally, given the flimsy and, to my mind, mendatious premise of the whole call for the enquiry, I have to consider the motivations and wider implications of the proposed inquiry.  Superficially it is simply a populist move with the prospect of saving a bit of money. Nothing too unusual about that from the States.  My concern is that there is an altogether more odious aspect to this , particularly its timing.  

We have been waiting far too long for this new States to get the Committe of Inquiry into 'historic' abuse underway.  Of course there is only so much work the States can handle at any time, and there's plenty that needs doing, like a freedom of information law. So the agenda setting is a key political tool.  It can be used to prevent unwanted items even getting to the assembly, or equally to fast track  selected itms. We know a few prominent States members were always opposed to the committee of inquiry, so it is not implausible to suggest that having another inquiry underway before the  Verita recommendations are put to the assembly would be a convenient excuse to further delay of everything.  It is a cynical game that can go on a long time - look at the more than 10 years it took to deliver the millenium town park.  When it comes to these two inquiries and their progress,  as they used to say so often at the start of questions on exams when I was young, compare and contrast.


All your devices could be hacked?
Crest
[info]st_ouennais


Tags:

They cannot, did you when you had the opportunity?
Crest
[info]st_ouennais




As an alternative:



Tags:

More on nitrogen
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
Further to my recent blog piece http://st-ouennais.livejournal.com/153816.html, the Soil Association has issued a press release:


Why we need a solar-powered farming system

20 April 2012

‘Too much nitrogen harms the environment and the economy’

A new Soil Association report, to be launched next week [Wed 25 April] at a House of Commons agro-ecology event [1], calls for farming to become less dependent on manufactured nitrogen fertiliser, and makes the case for a transformation of our current farming system to one that obtains nitrogen from nitrogen-fixing legumes. New evidence suggests that systems using this type of nitrogen behave differently in terms of nitrogen retention and loss, and a move away from manufactured nitrogen would also help mitigate the climate change impact of farming and guard against the increasing cost of artificial nitrogen.

‘Too much nitrogen harms the environment and the economy’ was the key message from the recent European Nitrogen Assessment which reported a study by 200 scientists investigating the unprecedented changes humans have made to the global nitrogen cycle over the last century.

Through industrial processes, burning fossil fuels and growing crops, the supply of reactive nitrogen  into the environment has doubled in the last 100 years. The biggest source of this reactive nitrogen is from the industrial manufacture of fertiliser for farming. This energy intensive process produces high levels of nitrous oxide  and uses natural gas, a non-renewable fossil fuel, which will get more expensive as supplies get scarce. This will put an upward pressure on fertiliser and food prices and poses a long-term threat to our food security.

The report - Just say N2O: From manufactured fertiliser to biologically-fixed nitrogen -  reviews the extent to which organic systems can meet the double challenge of reducing nitrogen losses and building stores of soil organic nitrogen in order to reduce dependency on manufactured nitrogen. The use of manufactured nitrogen is not allowed in organic systems, so inputs of nitrogen come from nitrogen fixed by legumes, often clover leys as part of a crop rotation that also controls pest and diseases.

Scientific evidence shows that the lower nitrogen inputs in organic farming can lead to lower N2O emissions compared to non-organic farms although more research is needed in a number of key areas. We are calling on the Government to look at the issue of reducing our dependency on manufactured nitrogen, and increasing efficiency of nitrogen use, as a matter of urgency.

Emma Hockridge, head of policy at the Soil Association, said:
“We have a worrying dependence on manufactured fertiliser for our food supply. Making the most efficient use of limited nitrogen inputs will, by necessity, become a key driver for future proofing our farming systems. Current policy and proposed technological-fixes to deal with the problems caused by manufactured nitrogen are either woefully inadequate, or unlikely to deliver within the time-frame needed. Although not perfect, organic farming systems offer viable solutions to the problem of over dependence on manufactured nitrogen.”


Sums up much of this blog in one humorous video clip
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
Climate change, oil, and farmers all get in the act.




spotted via http://tomgruchy.blogspot.com/2012/04/battle-of-jersey-pirate-version.html

Oh what a tangled web......
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
I was reading on line this morning that the Cameron's fortune was enmeshed in the use of various offshore tax efficient regimes, or dodges as the papers usually call them.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/apr/20/david-cameron-jersey-panama-geneva

Nothing illegal there of course.  And notice the attempted positive gloss for  Jersey as the only place listed that is somehow OECD compliant.  Fascinating isnt it that only a few weeks ago Chancellor George Osborne was feigning shock that the very highest earners in the UK paid such a small percentage of tax on their earnings. (http://citywire.co.uk/money/osborne-shocked-by-tax-avoidance-of-super-rich/a581002

Mr Cameron senior didn't qualify as super rich on the scale Osborne was talking of, but nonetheless clearly knew how to play a tax avoidance game.  So  when Mr Cameron and his party talk of clamping down on tax dodging, do you think he is referring to these sort of activities by his family , friends and colleagues?   I do not for one minute believe that.   Leona Helmsley famously said "We dont pay taxes, only little people pay taxes".  She might just as well have written the manifesto for the truly rich with that single phrase.

Locally, earlier this week we had a statement from our assistant minister at the treasury, claiming the wealthiest in our island pay their fair share. The top ten percent of  earners pay 49% of income tax and their effective rate is 19% I think he said. Of course this is a total non sequitur.  Income is not synonymous with wealth. In Jersey one can be wealthy on a relatively low income, especially if one has inherited real estate or is the beneficiary of a well endowed trust fund.  Like so much that I write about in this blog, the error comes in taking a singular partial line through a problem rather than looking at a  more holisitc and complete picture with some systems approach.

Just as one can be wealthy with a modest income, one can also be rich with relatively little wealth!  It all rather depends on what you are measuring and for what reason.  While we are  certainly not poor, on almost any measure of local household income or assets we are not rich either.  What we do have , thanks to having made energy-efficiency changes to the house, and growing a fair bit of our food, and not bothering with fancy holidays or consumer gadgets, is a little more income than expenditure.  But it goes beyond just that financial aspect.  That arrangement means less time spent having to earn and fret about income  which leaves more time for participating in activities and community affairs.  

So back to deputy Noel's comments.  The basis of his comparison seems to me to be all wrong.  It is not the proportion of income that makes the payments fair or not, it is the proportion of your disposable income, after paying for essentials like food and water that is critical.  It is that disposable income that eventually becomes wealth in the form of assets and capital, if used to that end. Equally, without disposable income there is no mechanism to acquire assets or  capital (excepting inheritance or theft!).  And in our system such capital is barely taxed at all and as such that is where the real money of the seriously wealthy lays.

It is not new thinking of course, Here is Dickens writing over 160 years ago.
"My other piece of advice, Copperfield, said Mr. Micawber, you know. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery. The blossom is blighted, the leaf is withered, the god of day goes down upon the dreary scene, and, in short, you are for ever floored. As I am"
Tags:

Nitrogen in the big picture.
Crest
[info]st_ouennais
There is a complex relationship between fossil fuels, food production and climate change.  Immediately one might well think of carbon, and it is certainly one factor connected to all, but it is  not the only one.   Water and water vapour is an another example.  Plants need certain levels of water in the soil to thrive, and climate change  threatens to leave currently fertile parts of the world seriously decifient.  The feedback and forcing effects of water vapour in the air , and of cloud formation and its impacts on climate change is one of the few areas where there is arguably some small  genuine scientific debate.  Not the fundamentlal science, but the numerical factors used that then feed into the models.

Apart from water and carbon (in the form of Co2 in the atmosphere), plants need three other major chemical inputs -phosphorous, potassium and nitrogen.  This paper  http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/7/2/024005/article  discusses the role of nitrogen and specifically N20 in both climate change and food production.  It also relates to fossil fuels in that the procses for production of nitrogen fertiliser is a high  energy one requiring  hydrogen.  Typically that hydrogen is supplied from natural gas, methane, or sometimes coal.

You will not be surprised to read that a vegetarian like me generally supports their conclusion that eating less meat is a good solution.  However it is also true that I do not find their rationale too convincing.  Several of the scenarios use a factor for projected improvements on efficieny in use of fertilizers and manures, but no indication is given on how this might be done.  I also find it problematic in that is neglect the other interrelatad factores such as water and carbon.  If one were to take a somewhat more holistic and systems approach a different option might be preferable. 

Clearly the use of organic farming systems with its prohibition of artificial (nitrogen) fertilizers would be a candidate.  We also know that the use of composts and leys to fertility building help capture and retain carbon in the soil too - a futher benefit.  Further, such humus rich soils are more moisture retentive .  Not only does it make a contribution to slowing our gree house gas emissions, it also helps in mitigation of one the critical factors as far as food production is concerned.

You are viewing [info]st_ouennais's journal